So true are these words. How to be united with the world. After all the world is not different from what we are. Getting to know this through knowledge or otherwise is the one termed Mukti?
One thing is missing in this piece is "the process of writing". The "seer", the "seen" and the process of "seeing" - when all are indeed one and we create these 3 is the ultimate tatvam in Vedanta. Similarly the "Knower" (Subject /Actor), "Knowing" (Action /process) and the "Known" (object). In Vedanta this is discussed in many places - including "drik, drishya viveka". (This is called as Tri-puti). In Bhagavadgita - 18.18 this is dealt in detail - read with multiple commentaries. You'd need a bit of Linguistic understanding to go deep in this. This sloka has many "Goodartha" deep/ hidden meanings.
I have been thinking recently about our state of temples. They have changed their forms from being cultural and binding factors to just business centres. mostly people who are visiting the temples are doing mechanical things. how can we revive the temples as discussion forums for arts, culture, social responsibilities from being just "transactional" in nature. there are satsangas being organized in the temples, but they just follow the bhakthi movement. how can we revive usage of sanskrit, learning of vedas, and then to create a more responsible generation than ours? ideas are welcome...
So true are these words. How to be united with the world. After all the world is not different from what we are. Getting to know this through knowledge or otherwise is the one termed Mukti?
ReplyDeleteOne thing is missing in this piece is "the process of writing". The "seer", the "seen" and the process of "seeing" - when all are indeed one and we create these 3 is the ultimate tatvam in Vedanta. Similarly the "Knower" (Subject /Actor), "Knowing" (Action /process) and the "Known" (object). In Vedanta this is discussed in many places - including "drik, drishya viveka". (This is called as Tri-puti). In Bhagavadgita - 18.18 this is dealt in detail - read with multiple commentaries. You'd need a bit of Linguistic understanding to go deep in this. This sloka has many "Goodartha" deep/ hidden meanings.
ReplyDeleteLet me read the passage
ReplyDelete